Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 10756827"

See other formats


United States Patent and Trademark Office 



UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
United States Patent and Trademark Office 
Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS 
P.O. Box 1450 

Alexandria, Virginia 223 1 3- 1450 
www.usptO.gov 



APPLICATION NO. 



FILING DATE 



FIRST NAMED INVENTOR 



ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. 



CONFIRMATION NO. 



10/756,827 



01/14/2004 



Yoshio Miyamoto 



38834 7590 06/01/2005 

WESTERMAN, HATTOR1, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LLP 
1250 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NW 
SUITE 700 

WASHINGTON, DC 20036 



042018 



2379 



EXAMINER 



TRIEU, VAN THANH 



ART UNIT 



PAPER NUMBER 



2636 

DATE MAILED: 06/01/2005 



Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. 



PTO-90C (Rev. 10/03) 



Office Action Summary 


Application No. 

10/756,827 


Applicant(s) 

MIYAMOTO ETAL 


Examiner 

Van T. Trieu 


Art Unit 

2636 





The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address » 
Period for Reply 



A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTH(S) FROM 
THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION. 

- Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1 . 1 36(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed 
after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. 

- If the period for reply specified above is less than thirty (30) days, a reply within the statutory minimum of thirty (30) days will be considered timely. 

- If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. 

- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 1 33). 
Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any 
earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b). 

Status 

1 )K Responsive to communication(s) filed on 14 January 2004 . 
2a)D This action is FINAL. 2b)S This action is non-final. 

3) D Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is 

closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 CD. 1 1 , 453 O.G. 213. 

Disposition of Claims 

4) ^ Claim(s) 1^8 is/are pending in the application. 

4a) Of the above claim(s) is/are withdrawn from consideration. 

5) ^ Claim(s) 7 and 8 is/are allowed. 

6) [X] Claim(s) 1 and 3-6 is/are rejected. 

7) [3 Claim(s) 2 is/are objected to. 

8) D Claim(s) are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. 

Application Papers 

9) D The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 

10) D The drawing(s) filed on is/are: a)D accepted or b)D objected to by the Examiner. 

Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a). 
Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d). 

1 1) D The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner. Note the attached Office Action or form PTO-152. 

Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 

12) M Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 1 19(a)-(d) or (f). 
a)M All b)D Some * c)D None of: 

1 M Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 

2. D Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. . 

3. D Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage 

application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). 
* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received. 



Attachment(s) 

1 ) |3 Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 

2) O Notice of Draftsperson's Patent Drawing Review (PTO-948) 

3) [3 Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO-1449 or PTO/SB/08) 

Paper No(s)/Mail Date 4/2904 . 



4) O Interview Summary (PTO-413) 

Paper No(s)/Mail Date. . 

5) D Notice of Informal Patent Application (PTO-152) 

6) □ Other: . 



U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 
PTOL-326 (Rev. 1-04) 



Office Action Summary 



Part of Paper No./Mail Date May2005 



Application/Control Number: 10/756,827 <, Page 2 

Art Unit: 2636 

DETAILED ACTION 

Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 

The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that 
form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: 
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless - 

(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public 
use or on sale in this country, morethan one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United 
States. 

1 . Claims 1 and 3-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by 
Partio etal[US 6,021,150]. 

Regarding claim 1 , the claimed an electronic digital pressure switch for detecting a gas 
pressure and generating an output, comprising: a housing that has a ventilating portion 
allowing a gas to pass there through (the discharge chamber containing laser gas and 
electronic that regulate a function of the laser housed within a baffle enclosure by a gas 
sensor 330, a temperature sensor 600, pressure sensitive switch and indicator to 
monitor pressure and shut-off the laser. The baffle enclosure includes an upper and 
lower solid panels 21 0, which have holes or slots for allowing air flows through much of 
the enclosure for ventilating, removing or sweeping out biologically-incompatible gases 
that may leak within the interior of the enclosure, see Figs. 2 and 6, col. 4, lines 42-52, 
col. 5, lines 62-67, col. 6, lines 16-28 and 44-50, col. 7, lines 24-27, col. 8, lines 38-56, 
col. 10, lines 49-55 and col. 11, lines 29-32). 



Application/Control Number: 10/756,827 Page 3 

Art Unit: 2636 

Regarding claim 3, the claimed ventilation portions are at both upper and lower portions 
of the housing (the holes or slots in both upper and lower panels 210, see Fig. 1). 

Regarding claim 4, the contact output that turns ON/OFF according to detected 
pressure and that allows ON and OFF values to be set (the control electronic 150 allows 
to set of pressure and flow rate desired values, and to turn ON/OFF the layer according 
to the detected pressure level, see Fig. 1, col. 6, lines 9-15, col. 7, lines 1 1-27, col. 8, 
lines 48-56 and col. 10, lines 14-55); and the display means, which reads upon the 
control electronic 150 to provide indicating of detected temperature, pressure, flow 
volume, on/off valve and ON/OFF laser conditions, see Fig. 1, col. 7, lines 11-27 and 
col. 10, lines 35-55.; and the analog output that changes its output values according to 
detected pressure (the temperature and/or pressure sensor outputs analog signals, see 
col. 7, lines 24-67 and col. 9, lines 48-50). 

Regarding claim 5, the claimed plurality of the contact outputs, which read upon the 
control electronic 150 comprising more than one contact outputs for controlling and 
indicating the status of on/off valve, on/off laser and switches, see Figs. 1 , 6 and 9. 

Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 

The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all 

obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: 

(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set 
forth in section 1 02 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and 
the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the 



Application/Control Number: 10/756,827 Page 4 

Art Unit: 2636 

invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. 
Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. 

This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of 

the claims under 35 U.S.C. 103(a), the examiner presumes that the subject matter of 

the various claims was commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein 

were made absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation 

under 37 CFR 1 .56 to point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim that was 

not commonly owned at the time a later invention was made in order for the examiner to 

consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 103(c) and potential 35 U.S.C. 102(e), (f) or (g) 

prior art under 35 U.S.C. 103(a). 

2. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 1 03(a) as being unpatentable over Partio et 
al [US 6,021 ,150] in view of Rocci, Jr. et al [US 5,676,129]. 
Regarding claim 6, Partio et al fails to disclose delay time can be set for the contact 
output or the contact outputs. However, Partio et al teaches that the control electronic 
150 includes a microprocessor for manually and/or automatically controlling and 
indicating statuses/conditions of the detected temperature, pressure, flow volume, on/off 
valve and ON/OFF laser conditions, see Fig. 1 , col. 6, lines 5-1 5, col. 7, lines 1 1-27, col. 
10, lines 35-55 and col. 1 1 , lines 29-51 . Rocci, Jr. et al suggests that a microprocessor 
14 is programmed to display the remaining doses, the elapse time and a predetermined 
delay time period for providing reliability detect a pressure pulse by a miniature pressure 
sensor 12, ON/OFF values and displaying on a display 15, see Figs. 1-8, col. 5, lines 
26-67 and col. 6, lines 1-67. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skill in the 
art at the time the invention was made substitute the microprocessor programmable 



Application/Control Number: 10/756,827 Page 5 

Art Unit: 2636 

functions of Rocci Jr., et al for the microprocessor controller of Partio et al because 
the microprocessor is a digital electronic device having memories, which can be 
programmed to execute a different operation functions such as delaying time for 
providing a higher detecting pressure outputs. 



Conclusion 

3. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to 
applicant's disclosure. 

Watson et al discloses a laser discharging chamber that includes ventilating panels for 
weeping out of undesired gases within the chamber according to the pressure switch. 
[US 5,748,656] 

Zheng et al discloses a modular gas control device for use with a compressed gas 
cylinder comprising a pressure sensor and a ventilating system within a gas cabinet or 
housing for ventilate of the leakage gases. [US 6,31 4,986] 
Campell discloses a method of sensing a ventilation failure measures a ventilation 
cycle and if the pressure is not maintained throughout the whole of an inspiration period 
above the setting for the low datum point an alarm is signaled. [US 5,640,149 
Sagimiya discloses switch device for pressure switch displays data about high level of 
setting values used to turn switch ON and OFF of switch. [JP 2001 1 168701 A] 



4. 



Claims 7 and 8 are allowable over the prior art. 



Application/Control Number: 10/756,827 



Page 6 



Art Unit: 2636 

5. Claims 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but 
would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the 
base claim and any intervening claims. 



6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from 

J 

examiner should be directed to primary examiner Van Trieu whose telephone number 
is (571) 272-2972. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri from 7:00 AM to 
3:00 PM. 

If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's 
supervisor, Mr. Jeffery Hofsass can be reached on (571 ) 272-2981 . 




Van Trieu 
Primary Examiner 
Date: 5/26/05